Tree

Navigation ...

lh_home.jpg
lh_personal.jpg

Scientific Writing ...

lh_AA.jpg
lh_AC.jpg
lh_BE.jpg
lh_CS.jpg
lh_DA.jpg
lh_ED.jpg
lh_GP.jpg
lh_LW.jpg
lh_MA.jpg
lh_ME.jpg
lh_PR.jpg
lh_SA.jpg
lh_SF.jpg

Other Writing ...

lh_AR.jpg
lh_ES.jpg
lh_MU.jpg
lh_SP.jpg

Reference details

Author(s) Year Title Reference View/Download

Les Hatton

2004h

Some empirical test observations in client / server systems

IEEE Computer, 40(5), p.24-29, May 2007GUI_blind.pdf

Synopsis and invited feedback

This work was reviewed and accepted by domain-specific experts appointed independently.

If you would like to provide feedback just e-mail me here.

Synopsis Invited Feedback Importance (/10, author rated :-) )
Defect distributions for two products from very different applications areas show that users notice defects much more easily in the graphical user interface than they do in the underlying server even when the server is entirely responsible for the accuracy of the results. This serves as an important warning for users to be a little more careful in inspecting the quality of the output rather than just the way it is presented. The concept is here presented as GUI blindness.None yet9

Related links

Related papers and links
Sorry, no links registered in database yet.

Auto-generated: $Revision: 1.43 $, $Date: 2008/03/03 23:38:56 $, Copyright Les Hatton 2001-