Navigation ...
|
|
|
Scientific Writing ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Writing ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference details
Synopsis and invited feedback
Peer review is important and acquiring competent reviewers is becoming a major problem for the journals today so I will be very happy to include constructive comment (positive or negative) with acknowledgement. If I am not competent to judge your commentary I will try and find somebody who is.
If you would like to provide feedback just e-mail me here.
| Synopsis
| Invited Feedback
| Importance (/10, author rated :-) )
|
| The UK decided to run an initiative to invite grand challenges for researchers to tackle over the next 10-20 years. I suggested a grand challenge that we actually measure what we do to learn how and why it goes wrong. It was rejected and there goes another flying pig.
Joking aside, I believe passionately that if computer scientists do not constrain their collective tendencies to invent new stuff all the time and spend a little time trying to calibrate and learn from experience then computer science cannot be called a science in the same way that software engineering has little to do with conventional engineering. Measurement and progress are inseparable. | None yet | 153 |
Related links
| Related papers and links
|
| Sorry, no links registered in database yet. |
Auto-generated: $Revision: 1.43 $, $Date: 2008/03/03 23:38:56 $, Copyright Les Hatton 2001-
|
