Tree

Navigation ...

lh_home.jpg
lh_personal.jpg

Scientific Writing ...

lh_AA.jpg
lh_AC.jpg
lh_BE.jpg
lh_CS.jpg
lh_DA.jpg
lh_ED.jpg
lh_GP.jpg
lh_LW.jpg
lh_MA.jpg
lh_ME.jpg
lh_PR.jpg
lh_SA.jpg
lh_SF.jpg

Other Writing ...

lh_AR.jpg
lh_ES.jpg
lh_MU.jpg
lh_SP.jpg

Reference details

Author(s) Year Title Reference View/Download

Les Hatton

1996g

Small components AREN'T beautiful, continued ...

D3 magazine, May 1996D3_May96.pdf

Synopsis and invited feedback

If you would like to provide feedback just e-mail me here.

Synopsis Invited Feedback Importance (/10, author rated :-) )
Continues the argument. The focus on defect density is flawed in light of the fact that if X, Y are random variables, then (Y/X) v. X is not random. Today a focus on defect counts would be more sensible.None yet5

Related links

Related papers and links
Sorry, no links registered in database yet.

Auto-generated: $Revision: 1.43 $, $Date: 2008/03/03 23:38:56 $, Copyright Les Hatton 2001-